8/1/2023 0 Comments Gitx for mac![]() ![]() Setting up / managing repositories is straight forward, with simple options for cloning an SVN repo, or creating GitHub/Beanstalk/Bitbucket repos. Sure, it handles a lot of the features you don't need, but it has very simple repo setup, and behaves like you'd expect of an OS X application (things like quick-look, drag & drop, integration with some other common apps for diffs, etc). While it's tagline is "the most powerful git client for Mac" I also think it's one of the easiest to use. I know you're after OSS/free, but still think this is a useful contribution, even if just for others looking for Git apps (student/education discounts available too). I switched to Tower after I got fed up with the free options. I'm thinking KISS principle here for people that do not use version control for anything else and just want to "upload" their websites. I'm looking for something more pared down that only covers the basics and is better suited for a specific task than at running with the big dogs. What client software should I point them to?Įdit: Most suggestions to date seem to focus on full-blown frontends to all of Git's functionality. Open source would be preferred, but any reputable freeware would be acceptable. It also gives the clone/remote URLs for each project and makes it fairly easy to check what the status of the remote repository is. There is a GitLab instance available for each client that has one project per domain and makes adding their public key fairly easy. has a simple interface where a basic workflow of committing and pushing is easy to accomplish without understanding the intricacies of distributed version control.…authentication using an RSA key pair (generation of this would be a bonus).makes it relatively simple to setup and initialize….I am looking to suggest a Git client for OS X that: Any commits to the master branch pushed by the authorized key trigger a hook script that deploys the site to the production servers. Changes need to be pushed to a remote repository that is accessible only via SSH key login. In fact, there is no access at all to the front-end server. The situation is that several clients have developed website(s) of the mostly static HTML sort, but the server they need deploy to doesn't have your usual collection of 1990s protocols available (for example, no FTP). The takeaway for me: the cloud is a great place to get started, but when your business begins to scale it pays off to revisit that strategy and see if there are better options.Personally I'd just pop open a terminal and brew-up the usual *nix shell tools, but I need to make a software recommendation to some clients that need something a bit more newbie friendly. I wonder what a switch to Cloudflare’s R2 would’ve done to their costs? Outbound traffic on R2 is completely free and it would probably be a much faster and easier migration that might yield them most of those same savings. But when you get it out, you pay an enormous cost.” “The true hidden price for AWS is coming from the traffic cost, they sell a reasonably priced storage, and it’s even free to upload it. Moving off AWS and on to internally owned storage and saved Prerender big, but they state the major savings was on the outbound traffic cost. Not only that: but traffic costs add up too. Turns out storing multiple terabytes of prerendered web page contents in this way on a 3rd party server is hugely expensive. Side note: perhaps server-rendering and pre-rendering HTML are good ideas after all? Just sayin’ ![]() They’re handling over 70,000 pages per minute, and storing around 560 million pages. ![]() Prerender caches and prerenders their customers’ JavaScript pages so search engines can have a pure HTML file to crawl and index. Now, it’s worth noting what they were doing with AWS. Their annual server costs reduced from $1 million to just $200k: that’s an 80% reduction. The engineering team at Prerender.io just finished a multi-month migration off AWS and saved themselves a bundle of money in the process. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |